In case you somehow missed all the announcements posted all over the web not to mention all the different feeds listed in your admin panel, Wordpress has just announced the release of version 2.5.

In what is considered a major release, the folks over at Wordpress, among many feature additions/improvements, have done a lot to improve the backend including upgrading to TinyMCE 3.0 for better compatibility and HTML editing plus the admin area is now widget aware which will open up your blog’s backend to widget developers.

The upgrade doesn’t include any major database changes so in theory the upgrade should be somewhat painless and any plugins that rely on the database shouldn’t be affected but as always, back everything up and turn off all your plugins before starting the upgrade.

Download version 2.5 here and feel free to post you upgrade thoughts and or issues in the comments section when you are done.

Bookmark to:

Hide Sites

I just wanted to post a quick drive by to again re-enforce my submission requirements even while I am looking through the latest email from a submitter questioning why their blog was rejected. This latest question, in between insults in regards to members of my family, was from someone who couldn’t believe that his/her pride and joy wasn’t up to the standards I set for free inclusion on my site, by the way did I say it was my site and that it was free?

The site in question might have been a decent site. It had a few months of continuous posting history, had almost 400 pages indexed in Google, and was a PR3. The submission included a decent, non-spammy title and an OK 3 or 4 sentence description and was even submitted to the most appropriate category. Everything sounds great so far right? Well one look at the site and every bit of good was wiped out. On the front page alone I counted 17 different and distinct ad blocks including 4 that appeared even before the first word of real content.

Now I will concede that a webmaster is free to put as much advertising as they want on their sites as long as these same webmasters also concede that a visitor is free to click away from a site if they find the advertising to be too much. Considering when I review a site I do so from a visitors standpoint, there is a point where the advertising gets in the way. The site in the example above I will admit is an extreme example of that but be advised there is a point where it is too much. With that said I am including what I consider to be obtrusive advertising which will automatically get your site rejected.

- Pop ups of any kind and in my continuing effort to be fair, pop unders are a no no as well.
- Large ad blocks placed before any content. I don’t have an issue with it placed within the content as long as it doesn’t interfere with the reading of said content but when the only thing that I see when opening a blog is a huge 336X280 or larger ad block, forget it.
- More space dedicated to ad blocks than to real content.
- A blog dedicated strictly to driving traffic through affiliate links.

Of course this isn’t an all inclusive list and the final decision will be based on my opinion of whether a particular site meets the submission requirements to be listed, but it should serve as a good starting point. Oh and did I say it was my site and that it was free?

Bookmark to:

Hide Sites

One problem with running free directories involves the number of submissions that often need to be reviewed. With the proliferation of automated and semi-automated submission tools currently available, that issue will only get worse. With that said though, what can you say as a submitter when you receive an email from a directory telling you that your submission has been rejected and you can’t even remember submitting to that directory?

I got one of those email messages today from the LostDirectory.com.

We are sorry. We could not approve your link in the LostDirectory. Your wesite is rejected for one or more of the following reasons.1. Submitted without completing the payment.
2. Submitted without providing recoprocal link.
3. Low Quality or PR0.

Please follow all submission guidelines and retry your submission.

Thank you,

Now putting aside the spelling errors in the rejection email, I just had to check out the directory that finally got around to rejecting my submission (for which of my sites I can only guess) that I can’t even remember doing.

On the surface the directory looks quite promising, a PR4 with inner pages that also have PR and it accepts free submissions. Then I came across the reason for my forgetting about submitting to this particular site. Browsing through the latest additions page you discover that some of the sites listed near the bottom were added in December, not last December which would be bad enough, but instead were added in December of 2006!

With that realization, I figured that it was about time to document a few things that you might want to look for when deciding whether or not a directory is worth submitting to and this directory provides a perfect opportunity.

The general belief is that submitting and being listed in a web directory will rarely harm you in regards to most search engines but when it comes to the benefits of being listed, the jury is still out. One thing is for sure, directories with questionable review/listing policies have very limited benefits if any at all. With that said, what should you look for before taking the time to submit your site?

The most obvious would be what is the directory’s Google PageRank? On the surface that question would normally be the first thing many would look at. But in my opinion, with the latest devaluing of directories within that formula for directories, that factor isn’t as important as it once was. Why? Well let’s go back to the Lost Directory again to find out.

As I mentioned it is a PR4 but when you query Google using the “site” command, you discover it only has one page indexed, and as of this writing, it isn’t even the home page. What good is a link that isn’t even being indexed? Then look at the editorial integrity of the site owner. To do that I normally use the site’s search engine and search for one or more keywords that if found show what type of sites are being accepted. For example, I searched for “viagra” on the Lost Directory and low and behold discovered 9 listings mostly for pharmacy sites. While not illegal or a deal breaker, do you want to be buried in between tons of Viagra and Cialis listings?

Lastly, browse though some of the sites listed especially in the shopping categories. Look at the quality. Are there a lot of MFA (made for adsense) listings or affiliate sites? If so don’t waste your time.

Quality directories are still worth submitting to, especially those that specialize in the particular niche that your site falls into, and can help you in the long run. The hardest part is figuring out which are quality and which are junk. If you do your homework before submitting you will be surprised on the benefits. Don’t and you might get the same type of email I got today.

Bookmark to:

Hide Sites

So you run a blog with the sole purpose of reviewing blog directories. If you think about it that is actually a fairly useful endeavor that when done properly would be a useful resource for bloggers and a welcome addition to any blog directory or resource site. As a reviewer, one of the functions of blog directories that you would probably want to check out is just how up to date the listings are and whether a particular directory follows their submission requirements.

With that in mind, when a directory actively removes dead or inactive blogs, follows their listed submission requirements and does their best to provide a valuable resource, you would think that directory would get a favorable recommendation. All of that would be true, until that is, a blog that gets removed for not being updated in almost 8 months is a blog review site that had previously recommended that directory. Amazingly afterwards said blogger comes out of hibernation at least long enough to rip you for having the audacity to remove their link.

They added my blog to their directory but a few months later I got an email saying that my blog was rejected… I wonder why… I emailed their admin to ask why they decided to remove the link to my blog from their directory, let’s see what he says.

Of course the few visitors that site could still be getting might think that I deleted his site for no reason and that I ignored his email asking for an explanation thus earning the change in recommendation. Also missing from his updated post is the emails I did send to him explaining why he was removed as is the comment on his blog that I submitted responding to his claims.

My response:

If you ever get 3 consecutive months of current posting history per my submission requirements feel free to re-submit, otherwise I don’t see what re-listing your site would contribute to visitors of the directory that come looking for regularly updated resources.

To summarize, we have a blog directory review blog that hasn’t reviewed a blog in over 7 months that criticizes blog directories for following their posted listing requirements and that states: Before I give a bad recommendation on a directory, I approach them via email a couple of times and post their response, if any… in their header but won’t post email or comment responses.

And finally what is required to get a recommendation? From what I can tell, all that is needed is to accept their blog and you’re well on your way to their “coveted” recommendation.

With all the above issues I would have to rate A Blog For Bloggers a 1 out of 5 stars

Bookmark to:

Hide Sites